McMaster Outlines Hillary Clinton–Like Approach to Certification of Iran Nuclear Deal

This article appeared in the National Review on July 17, 2017. Click here to view the original article.

By Fred Fleitz
July 17, 2017

At a noon conference call today on how the Trump administration plans to certify the nuclear deal with Iran (the JCPOA) for a second time, National Security Council director H. R. McMaster spoke at length about why the JCPOA is a bad deal and how it has not changed Iran’s behavior. McMaster and Treasury Secretary Steven Mnuchin also announced new sanctions against Iran. However, McMaster still indicated that the administration plans to again certify to Congress that Iran is complying with the agreement. This decision includes certifying that the agreement is in the national-security interests of the United States.

McMaster said Iran is in default of the spirit of the agreement and “we need to take a closer look at whether it is violating the letter of the deal.” According to McMaster, Iran has been “walking up to violating the letter” of the JCPOA.

This is false. I asked McMaster how the Trump administration could do this in light of clear evidence that Iran is violating the JCPOA. I mentioned recent op-eds that Ambassador John Bolton and I wrote on these violations in The Hill and NRO. I said that this is a very troubling decision that amounts to looking the other way on Iran’s violations, legitimizing the dangerous concessions the Obama administration made to get this deal and goes against the president’s statements during the presidential campaign. I added that this policy to stick with the JCPOA is little different than what Hillary Clinton would have done if she had won the 2016 election.

McMaster refused to answer my question. He refused to address the issue of Iranian violations at all until another questioner pushed him on this which led McMaster to give the misleading answer above on Iran being in default of the spirit of this agreement.

McMaster mentioned an ongoing review of Iran policy that reportedly will be completed by late summer. But with a decision like this, there seems little doubt the administration is not going to fulfill President Trump’s campaign promise to kill or substantially renegotiate the nuclear deal.

My hope is that President Trump will look at the facts concerning the dangers of the JCPOA and Iranian violations and not certify Iranian compliance. Other steps are urgently needed to bring the Trump administration’s Iran policy in line with what President Trump promised during the campaign.

Fred Fleitz served in national-security positions for 25 years with the CIA, the DIA, the State Department, and the House Intelligence Committee staff. He is now senior vice president with the Center for Security Policy, a national-security think tank. Fleitz is the author of a 2016 book on the nuclear deal with Iran, Obamabomb: A Dangerous and Growing National Security Fraud.

The Foundation for American Security and Freedom

Ambassador John Bolton, Chairman

About The Foundation for American Security and Freedom

FASF is committed to restoring and protecting our vital national security interests and preserving our way of life for our children. Through research, analysis, and the public dissemination of studies and opinions about foreign and defense policy, FASF will strengthen our public discourse, making clear the inextricable links between strong foreign and domestic national policies. By engaging the greatest thinkers and do-ers in the country, we will further our national security interests.